Ten days in Nairobi spent reading the fiscal statute as a living instrument of state power, tracing how the wording of a tax law, the architecture of a treaty and the shape of a corporate group each decide where value is recognised and which treasury is permitted to reach it.
The programme proceeded from a premise long settled in fiscal sociology, namely that the capacity of a state to tax is inseparable from its capacity to govern, and that the revenue bargain struck between a treasury and its taxpayers records, in ledgers and in statutes alike, the deeper settlement of power within a society. For jurisdictions across the African continent this history is neither abstract nor neutral, since the international rules that allocate taxing rights were drafted in rooms in which those jurisdictions were absent, and the treaty networks they inherited frequently surrender to the residence state precisely the base that a capital importing economy most needs to retain.
Across the ten days the delegation examined how the digital economy has loosened the connection between where profit is booked and where value is genuinely created, how illicit financial flows move value through structures that are individually lawful yet collectively abusive, and how the interpretive craft of reading a charging provision word by word remains the first and most durable defence a revenue authority possesses.
From the Ministry of Finance, Economic Development and Investment Protection of the Republic of Zimbabwe. They read every article, drafted charging provisions of their own, and defended each word against the scrutiny of the room.
swipe to see more →
The syllabus moved from the interpretation of the domestic statute toward the treaty and the transnational structure, so that each participant could see how a single transaction is claimed, contested and sometimes lost across several jurisdictions at once.
Reading the charging provision as both a drafter and a litigant, mapping trigger events, the burden of proof and the quiet work performed by the word deemed.
How value departs a jurisdiction through false invoicing, layered conduits and entities that hold shares and little else, and how authorities respond.